NMBL vs. ENDW
NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) and ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NMBL charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ENDW.
Performance
NMBL vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMBL achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than ENDW's 10.76% return.
NMBL
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENDW
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NMBL vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | 5.30% | -0.27% |
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 10.76% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMBL and ENDW is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMBL vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank
NMBL
ENDW
NMBL vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMBL | ENDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 3.50 | -2.76 |
Drawdowns
NMBL vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMBL drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, which is greater than ENDW's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMBL and ENDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMBL | ENDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -6.44% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.63% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -0.81% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.57% | — |
Volatility
NMBL vs. ENDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMBL | ENDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 10.13% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.91% | 11.00% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.91% | 11.00% | +0.91% |
NMBL vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMBL has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NMBL vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison
NMBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than ENDW's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 2.18% | 1.91% |
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NMBL and ENDW have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.
ENDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.88% for NMBL.
They also come from different issuers: NovaTide and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 1.99% for NMBL and 0.29% for ENDW.
Find the right allocation for NMBL and ENDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer