NMBL vs. MAPP
NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) and MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NMBL charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for MAPP.
Performance
NMBL vs. MAPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMBL achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than MAPP's 4.04% return.
NMBL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MAPP
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.59K | $13.51K | $10.92K | |
| $29.75K | $28.39K | $73.37K |
NMBL vs. MAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | 2.78% | -0.27% |
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | 4.04% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMBL and MAPP is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMBL vs. MAPP — Risk / Return Rank
NMBL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAPP
NMBL vs. MAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NMBL | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NMBL vs. MAPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMBL drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum MAPP drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMBL and MAPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMBL | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -12.92% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -3.63% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -1.45% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility
NMBL vs. MAPP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMBL | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 10.50% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 11.04% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 11.04% | +2.06% |
NMBL vs. MAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMBL has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAPP's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
NMBL vs. MAPP - Dividend Comparison
NMBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than MAPP's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.41% | 2.78% |
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | 0.90% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NMBL and MAPP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAPP is cheaper at 0.92% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAPP is cheaper with a 0.92% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.
MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.90% for NMBL.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 1.99% for NMBL and 0.92% for MAPP.
Find the right allocation for NMBL and MAPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer