NMBL vs. PPI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) and PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMBL charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPI.

Performance

NMBL vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMBL achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 15.09% return.

NMBL

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PPI

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 13.39%
• 1Y: 35.02%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMBL vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	3.38%	-0.27%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	15.09%	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NMBL and PPI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

NMBL vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMBL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 73
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMBL vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMBL	PPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.84	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.26	—

Drawdowns

NMBL vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMBL drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum PPI drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMBL and PPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMBL	PPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.05%	-24.54%	+16.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.98%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	-4.45%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-6.47%	+4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NMBL	PPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.46%	16.25%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.46%	19.04%	-5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.46%	19.04%	-5.58%

NMBL vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMBL has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMBL vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

NMBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than PPI's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	0.90%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.02%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMBL and PPI in my portfolio?

NMBL and PPI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NMBL or PPI?

On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NMBL or PPI?

PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NMBL or PPI?

PPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.90% for NMBL.

What is the main difference between NMBL and PPI?

They also come from different issuers: NovaTide and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.99% for NMBL and 0.58% for PPI.