TFPN vs. NANC
TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) and NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFPN is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Tidal, while NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TFPN returned 6.27%/yr vs 20.55%/yr for NANC. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TFPN charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NANC.
Performance
TFPN vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than NANC's 9.12% return.
TFPN
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
NANC
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $826.89K | $806.25K | $1.03M | |
| $429.91K | $568.98K | $358.90K |
TFPN vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 16.44% | 3.61% | 2.67% | -1.83% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 9.12% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 10.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFPN and NANC is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.43 |
The correlation between TFPN and NANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFPN vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank
TFPN
NANC
TFPN vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFPN | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.47 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 5.80 | +3.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFPN vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum NANC drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and NANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFPN | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -20.94% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -12.21% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.72% | -20.94% | +4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -1.72% | -6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -2.64% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.09% | +0.16% |
Volatility
TFPN vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 4.54%. This indicates that TFPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFPN | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 4.54% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 11.90% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 14.96% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 16.81% | -3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 16.81% | -3.46% |
TFPN vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than NANC's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFPN vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% |
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFPN and NANC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TFPN has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to NANC (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPN dropped -16.72% vs NANC's -20.94%.
On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 20.55% vs 6.27% for TFPN. On fees, NANC is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, NANC has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 20.55% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NANC is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.
NANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.
TFPN is categorized as Global Allocation, while NANC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 0.72% for NANC.
TFPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFPN and NANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer