TFNS vs. TCHP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP).

TFNS and TCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TFNS is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 11, 2025. TCHP is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 4, 2020.

Performance

TFNS vs. TCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TFNS vs. TCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	-8.56%	10.41%
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	-10.79%	14.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly higher than TCHP's -10.79% return.

TFNS

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: -8.56%
• 6M: -4.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TCHP

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: -10.79%
• 6M: -9.58%
• 1Y: 15.68%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. TCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TCHP's 0.57% expense ratio.

TCHP

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF

TFNS

T. Rowe Price Financials ETF

Return for Risk

TFNS vs. TCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHP

TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 36
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFNS vs. TCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFNS	TCHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.45	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and TCHP is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TFNS vs. TCHP - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	0.54%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. TCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum TCHP drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and TCHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFNS	TCHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.00%	-42.34%	+28.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.11%	-13.51%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.14%	-11.71%	+8.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFNS	TCHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	23.06%	-7.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	23.44%	-7.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	23.37%	-7.91%