PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEXN vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEXN vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's 7.43% return.


TEXN

1D
-1.33%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
20.05%
6M
18.60%
1Y
30.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MGC

1D
-1.49%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.54%
1Y
24.48%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
20.05%8.33%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
7.43%15.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and MGC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.54

TEXN vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEXN
MGC

Energy

32.3%
2.3%

Technology

20.6%
42.9%

Industrials

16.3%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
9.8%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.9%

Financial Services

3.9%
10.9%

Communication Services

3.3%
12.3%

Utilities

2.7%
0.9%

Healthcare

2.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.1%

Energy

TEXN
32.3%
MGC
2.3%

Technology

TEXN
20.6%
MGC
42.9%

Industrials

TEXN
16.3%
MGC
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TEXN
11.6%
MGC
9.8%

Real Estate

TEXN
3.9%
MGC
0.9%

Financial Services

TEXN
3.9%
MGC
10.9%

Communication Services

TEXN
3.3%
MGC
12.3%

Utilities

TEXN
2.7%
MGC
0.9%

Healthcare

TEXN
2.7%
MGC
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

TEXN
2.1%
MGC
4.4%

Basic Materials

TEXN
0.7%
MGC
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEXN vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEXNMGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

TEXN vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and MGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEXNMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-52.26%

+45.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-9.85%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-3.81%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-7.17%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

TEXN vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEXNMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

13.08%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

17.39%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

18.24%

-3.74%

TEXN vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TEXN vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than MGC's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.90%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.40%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEXN and MGC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 30.05% vs 24.48% for MGC. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 30.05% return vs 24.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.90% for MGC.

TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.05% for MGC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEXN and MGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer