PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TERG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TERG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TERG achieves a 227.50% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


TERG

1D
-15.75%
1M
27.59%
YTD
227.50%
6M
210.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TERG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TERG and LINT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TERG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TERG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TERG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TERG drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, roughly equal to the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TERG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TERGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-49.54%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.52%

-12.86%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-20.48%

+5.90%

Volatility

TERG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TERGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

145.85%

168.83%

-22.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.85%

168.83%

-22.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.85%

168.83%

-22.98%

TERG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TERG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

TERG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TERG and LINT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TERG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TERG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer