TER vs. QRVO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and QRVO (Qorvo, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TER in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, QRVO in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, TER returned 36.09%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for QRVO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TER vs. QRVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 108.47% return, which is significantly higher than QRVO's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed QRVO with an annualized return of 36.09%, while QRVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.12% annualized return.

TER

• 1D: 5.72%
• 1M: 11.00%
• YTD: 108.47%
• 6M: 108.68%
• 1Y: 370.53%
• 3Y*: 54.13%
• 5Y*: 26.29%
• 10Y*: 36.09%

QRVO

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 7.74%
• YTD: 16.66%
• 6M: 11.95%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: -1.41%
• 5Y*: -11.67%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TER vs. QRVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TER Teradyne, Inc.	108.47%	54.39%	16.51%	24.78%	-46.35%	36.81%	76.73%	118.93%	-24.37%	66.16%
QRVO Qorvo, Inc.	16.66%	20.85%	-37.90%	24.24%	-42.04%	-5.94%	43.05%	91.39%	-8.81%	26.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TER and QRVO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.66

The correlation between TER and QRVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TER : $63.56B QRVO : $9.13B
EPS TER : $5.38 QRVO : $3.63
PE Ratio TER : 75.00 QRVO : 27.19
PS Ratio TER : 16.91 QRVO : 2.51
PB Ratio TER : 20.22 QRVO : 2.73
Total Revenue (TTM) TER : $3.79B QRVO : $3.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) TER : $2.23B QRVO : $1.69B
EBITDA (TTM) TER : $1.11B QRVO : $659.34M

Return for Risk

TER vs. QRVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TER

TER Risk / Return Rank: 98
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 97
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QRVO

QRVO Risk / Return Rank: 60
QRVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QRVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QRVO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QRVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QRVO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TER vs. QRVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TER	QRVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.56	0.60	+4.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.50	1.01	+3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.13	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.97	0.94	+13.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	49.81	1.84	+47.97

TER vs. QRVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 5.56, which is higher than the QRVO Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TER and QRVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TER vs. QRVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than QRVO's maximum drawdown of -74.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and QRVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TER	QRVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.30%	-74.54%	-22.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.73%	-21.97%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.18%	-60.68%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.12%	-74.03%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.12%	-74.54%	+15.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-50.59%	+47.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.67%	-31.90%	-26.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.49%	11.21%	-3.72%

Volatility

TER vs. QRVO - Volatility Comparison

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) at 14.93%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TER	QRVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.00%	14.93%	+10.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.10%	26.52%	+26.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.20%	34.68%	+32.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.20%	42.18%	+8.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.31%	42.04%	+3.27%

Dividends

TER vs. QRVO - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while QRVO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QRVO Qorvo, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TER Teradyne, Inc.	0.12%	0.25%	0.38%	0.41%	0.50%	0.24%	0.33%	0.53%	1.15%	0.67%	0.94%	1.16%

Financials

TER vs. QRVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradyne, Inc. and Qorvo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

QRVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 395.02M and revenue of 808.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

QRVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.51M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.

QRVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a net income of 29.73M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TER and QRVO in my portfolio?

TER and QRVO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TER or QRVO?

TER has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to QRVO (14.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs QRVO's -74.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.56 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.