TER vs. NEM
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. TER operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, TER returned 32.68%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for NEM. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TER vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 72.57% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -10.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 32.68%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.
TER
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -23.79%
- 6M
- 46.41%
- YTD
- 72.57%
- 1Y
- 256.28%
- 3Y*
- 43.17%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 32.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.17%
NEM
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -14.06%
- 6M
- -21.50%
- YTD
- -10.28%
- 1Y
- 54.92%
- 3Y*
- 30.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.71%
TER vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 72.57% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -10.28% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and NEM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1987 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, TER and NEM have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TER:
$52.25B
NEM:
$95.23B
TER:
$5.40
NEM:
$7.15
TER:
61.80
NEM:
12.48
TER:
13.94
NEM:
3.81
TER:
$3.79B
NEM:
$17.23B
TER:
$2.23B
NEM:
$8.97B
TER:
$1.11B
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
TER
NEM
TER vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TER | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.22 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.73 | 1.72 | +6.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.62 | 4.07 | +22.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TER vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -81.30% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.39% | -32.10% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -36.57% | -21.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -62.40% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -62.40% | +3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.02% | -32.10% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.57% | -41.34% | -17.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.68% | 13.53% | -3.85% |
Volatility
TER vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 31.18% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 10.19%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.18% | 10.19% | +20.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.69% | 37.41% | +23.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.53% | 47.75% | +25.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.98% | 38.21% | +13.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.26% | 35.72% | +10.54% |
Dividends
TER vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than NEM's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.14% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
TER vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and NEM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (31.18%) compared to NEM (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs NEM's -81.30%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer