TER vs. DAVE
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and DAVE (Dave Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TER in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, DAVE in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, TER returned 24.17%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for DAVE. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TER vs. DAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 90.11% return, which is significantly higher than DAVE's 68.33% return.
TER
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -13.96%
- 6M
- 52.66%
- YTD
- 90.11%
- 1Y
- 243.14%
- 3Y*
- 49.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.17%
- 10Y*
- 34.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.43%
DAVE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- 6M
- 127.68%
- YTD
- 68.33%
- 1Y
- 58.05%
- 3Y*
- 285.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DAVE Dave Inc. | $172.88M | $187.81M | $183.81M |
| $1.53B | $1.39B | $1.68B |
TER vs. DAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 90.11% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 24.61% |
DAVE Dave Inc. | 68.33% | 154.73% | 936.61% | -9.64% | -97.17% | 4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and DAVE is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
TER:
$57.56B
DAVE:
$5.01B
TER:
$7.28
DAVE:
$15.57
TER:
50.51
DAVE:
23.94
TER:
13.02
DAVE:
9.77
TER:
0.02
DAVE:
26.34
TER:
$4.46B
DAVE:
$551.52M
TER:
$2.65B
DAVE:
$427.68M
TER:
$1.42B
DAVE:
$165.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. DAVE — Risk / Return Rank
TER
DAVE
TER vs. DAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Dave Inc. (DAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TER | DAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.19 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.20 | 1.49 | +5.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.29 | 3.26 | +19.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TER vs. DAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, roughly equal to the maximum DAVE drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and DAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | DAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -99.01% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.98% | -39.11% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -44.67% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -99.01% | +39.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -18.56% | -5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.54% | -67.63% | +9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 17.88% | -6.92% |
Volatility
TER vs. DAVE - Volatility Comparison
Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 29.42% compared to Dave Inc. (DAVE) at 14.54%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | DAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.42% | 14.54% | +14.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.50% | 48.39% | +15.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.88% | 69.38% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.71% | 99.00% | -46.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.68% | 96.44% | -49.76% |
Dividends
TER vs. DAVE - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while DAVE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAVE Dave Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
TER vs. DAVE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Dave Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TER vs. DAVE - Profitability Comparison
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.62M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.
DAVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dave Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.00M and revenue of 147.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.3%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 437.81M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.
DAVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dave Inc. reported an operating income of 21.15M and revenue of 147.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 374.53M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.
DAVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dave Inc. reported a net income of 57.94M and revenue of 147.59M, resulting in a net margin of 39.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and DAVE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (29.42%) compared to DAVE (14.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs DAVE's -99.01%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and DAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer