TEQI vs. IGF
TEQI (T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEQI is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. TEQI is actively managed, while IGF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TEQI returned 9.02%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for IGF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEQI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
TEQI vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.05% return.
TEQI
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
TEQI vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 9.71% | 13.36% | 13.14% | 9.64% | -3.33% | 26.25% | 18.07% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.05% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | 11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEQI and IGF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TEQI and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TEQI vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TEQI
IGF
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Technology
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
TEQI
IGF
-
Healthcare
TEQI
IGF
-
Industrials
TEQI
IGF
Technology
TEQI
IGF
-
Energy
TEQI
IGF
Consumer Defensive
TEQI
IGF
-
Utilities
TEQI
IGF
Communication Services
TEQI
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
TEQI
IGF
-
Real Estate
TEQI
IGF
Basic Materials
TEQI
IGF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEQI vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
TEQI
IGF
TEQI vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEQI | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.62 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 8.05 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEQI | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.47 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.73 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.24 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
TEQI vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEQI | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -58.33% | +40.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -5.87% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.85% | -14.28% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -20.83% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -4.43% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -11.87% | +8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.90% | +0.12% |
Volatility
TEQI vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) is 2.68%, while iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that TEQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEQI | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 3.68% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 8.59% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 10.49% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 13.99% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 16.83% | -1.71% |
TEQI vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEQI vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than IGF's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.98% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 1.55% | 1.71% | 1.86% | 2.12% | 2.32% | 3.03% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEQI and IGF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGF has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to TEQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 5-year performance, IGF leads with 10.15% vs 9.02% for TEQI. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TEQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGF has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.55% for TEQI.
TEQI is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.39% for IGF.
TEQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEQI and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer