PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEQI vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEQI vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return.


TEQI

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.51%
YTD
9.71%
6M
11.55%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*

FNDF

1D
-0.67%
1M
6.97%
YTD
21.21%
6M
24.72%
1Y
44.71%
3Y*
24.10%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEQI vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
9.71%13.36%13.14%9.64%-3.33%26.25%18.07%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
21.21%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQI and FNDF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020

0.75

The correlation between TEQI and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEQI vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEQI
FNDF

Financial Services

20.3%
16.7%

Healthcare

12.9%
5.5%

Industrials

12.4%
15.9%

Technology

12.3%
11.1%

Energy

11.0%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
6.9%

Utilities

6.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

6.6%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.7%

Real Estate

3.3%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
11.3%

Financial Services

TEQI
20.3%
FNDF
16.7%

Healthcare

TEQI
12.9%
FNDF
5.5%

Industrials

TEQI
12.4%
FNDF
15.9%

Technology

TEQI
12.3%
FNDF
11.1%

Energy

TEQI
11.0%
FNDF
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

TEQI
7.2%
FNDF
6.9%

Utilities

TEQI
6.8%
FNDF
3.8%

Communication Services

TEQI
6.6%
FNDF
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TEQI
5.2%
FNDF
10.7%

Real Estate

TEQI
3.3%
FNDF
0.9%

Basic Materials

TEQI
2.2%
FNDF
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEQI vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQI
TEQI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TEQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQI vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEQIFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.53

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

4.24

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

16.19

-6.10

TEQI vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQI and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEQIFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.99

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.83

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.54

+0.44

Drawdowns

TEQI vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEQIFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.82%

-40.14%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-10.60%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-13.89%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-25.56%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.67%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-7.64%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.77%

-0.75%

Volatility

TEQI vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) is 2.68%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that TEQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEQIFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

5.26%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

12.53%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

15.06%

-4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

16.18%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

17.67%

-2.55%

TEQI vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEQI vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.84%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
1.55%1.71%1.86%2.12%2.32%3.03%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEQI and FNDF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to TEQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 13.35% vs 9.02% for TEQI. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TEQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.55% for TEQI.

TEQI is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEQI and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer