PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEQI vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEQI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.21% return.


TEQI

1D
1.19%
1M
2.72%
YTD
11.01%
6M
12.75%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

FDL

1D
0.78%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.52%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEQI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
11.01%13.36%13.14%9.64%-3.33%26.25%18.07%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
14.21%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQI and FDL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between TEQI and FDL has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TEQI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEQI
FDL

Financial Services

20.3%
15.1%

Healthcare

12.9%
16.8%

Industrials

12.4%
3.8%

Technology

12.3%
1.1%

Energy

11.0%
27.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
14.7%

Utilities

6.8%
6.5%

Communication Services

6.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
3.8%

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.3%

Financial Services

TEQI
20.3%
FDL
15.1%

Healthcare

TEQI
12.9%
FDL
16.8%

Industrials

TEQI
12.4%
FDL
3.8%

Technology

TEQI
12.3%
FDL
1.1%

Energy

TEQI
11.0%
FDL
27.3%

Consumer Defensive

TEQI
7.2%
FDL
14.7%

Utilities

TEQI
6.8%
FDL
6.5%

Communication Services

TEQI
6.6%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TEQI
5.2%
FDL
3.8%

Real Estate

TEQI
3.3%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

TEQI
2.2%
FDL
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEQI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQI
TEQI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TEQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEQIFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

5.99

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

14.59

-3.50

TEQI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQI and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEQIFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.27

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.89

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.45

+0.54

Drawdowns

TEQI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEQIFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.82%

-65.93%

+48.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-4.27%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-12.24%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-16.46%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-1.41%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-9.66%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.75%

+0.27%

Volatility

TEQI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) is 2.75%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that TEQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEQIFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.95%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

7.85%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

11.30%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.62%

14.31%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

17.11%

-1.99%

TEQI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEQI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than FDL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
1.53%1.71%1.86%2.12%2.32%3.03%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEQI and FDL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to TEQI (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.69% vs 9.28% for TEQI. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TEQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.53% for TEQI.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.45% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEQI and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer