TEPIX vs. UGPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX).
TEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. UGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008.
Performance
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | -17.65% | 30.08% | 14.17% | 91.81% | -51.01% | 46.85% | 64.53% | 71.30% | -5.89% | 49.17% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -27.95% | 36.28% | -21.79% | -11.49% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEPIX achieves a -17.65% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TEPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 22.57%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.29% annualized return.
TEPIX
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -12.17%
- YTD
- -17.65%
- 6M
- -15.84%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 22.57%
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -48.28%
- 1Y
- -30.96%
- 3Y*
- -15.66%
- 5Y*
- -37.37%
- 10Y*
- -14.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
TEPIX
UGPIX
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | -0.55 | +1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | -0.51 | +1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.94 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | -0.69 | +1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | -1.49 | +4.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | -0.55 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.10 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | -0.05 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.05 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEPIX and UGPIX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison
TEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than UGPIX's 8.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | 3.91% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.39% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
Drawdowns
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPIX and UGPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.14% | -99.66% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -51.12% | +26.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.97% | -98.52% | +13.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.97% | -99.10% | +14.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.81% | -97.95% | +22.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -82.60% | +32.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 23.70% | -15.86% |
Volatility
TEPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) is 10.12%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 15.79%. This indicates that TEPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.12% | 15.79% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 36.85% | -12.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.33% | 57.63% | -17.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.04% | 390.11% | -245.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.40% | 277.87% | -172.47% |