PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
UGPIX vs. FLCNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UGPIX and FLCNX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

UGPIX vs. FLCNX

Last updated Jun 1, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX).

UGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008. FLCNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UGPIX or FLCNX.

Performance

UGPIX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UGPIX:

-0.10

FLCNX:

0.83

Sortino Ratio

UGPIX:

0.46

FLCNX:

1.17

Omega Ratio

UGPIX:

1.06

FLCNX:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

UGPIX:

-0.07

FLCNX:

0.83

Martin Ratio

UGPIX:

-0.23

FLCNX:

2.84

Ulcer Index

UGPIX:

29.39%

FLCNX:

5.93%

Daily Std Dev

UGPIX:

79.36%

FLCNX:

22.66%

Max Drawdown

UGPIX:

-97.67%

FLCNX:

-32.07%

Current Drawdown

UGPIX:

-93.85%

FLCNX:

-2.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than FLCNX's 5.11% return.

UGPIX

YTD

12.12%

1M

-3.59%

6M

8.01%

1Y

-4.15%

3Y*

-13.17%

5Y*

-28.54%

10Y*

-17.18%

FLCNX

YTD

5.11%

1M

7.41%

6M

3.78%

1Y

18.24%

3Y*

21.83%

5Y*

17.27%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProFunds UltraChina

Fidelity Contrafund K6

UGPIX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.

UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UGPIX vs. FLCNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UGPIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UGPIX is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UGPIX is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UGPIX is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UGPIX is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UGPIX is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UGPIX is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
FLCNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCNX is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UGPIX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UGPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the FLCNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGPIX and FLCNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

UGPIX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison

UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FLCNX's 0.41% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina		2.60%2.91%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.77%
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6		0.41%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%

Drawdowns

UGPIX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -97.67%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and FLCNX.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

UGPIX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a higher volatility of 17.35% compared to Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) at 5.18%. This indicates that UGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...