UGPIX vs. FCNTX

In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of -17.18%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.30% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UGPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGPIX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than FCNTX's 4.77% yield.

The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -97.67%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and FCNTX.

ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a higher volatility of 17.35% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 5.14%. This indicates that UGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.