PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TENM vs. MSOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TENM vs. MSOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENM achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than MSOO's -23.81% return.


TENM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSOO

1D
-6.75%
1M
-28.26%
YTD
-23.81%
6M
-38.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENM vs. MSOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TENM and MSOO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TENM vs. MSOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TENM vs. MSOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TENMMSOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

-1.13

+3.30

Drawdowns

TENM vs. MSOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENM drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum MSOO drawdown of -72.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENM and MSOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TENMMSOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-72.39%

+68.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-70.12%

+69.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-47.41%

+46.71%

Volatility

TENM vs. MSOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TENMMSOODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

69.25%

-62.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

69.25%

-62.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

69.25%

-62.73%

TENM vs. MSOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TENM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MSOO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TENM vs. MSOO - Dividend Comparison

TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MSOO's 2.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TENM and MSOO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TENM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TENM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.

MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.28% for TENM.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TENM and 0.78% for MSOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TENM and MSOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer