MSOO vs. ARMG
MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ARMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
MSOO vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -26.25% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 190.00% return.
MSOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -25.21%
- YTD
- -26.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -46.26%
- 6M
- 220.35%
- YTD
- 190.00%
- 1Y
- 59.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.17M | $20.37M | $65.80M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $6.95K |
MSOO vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | -26.25% | -61.39% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 190.00% | -48.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOO and ARMG is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOO vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
MSOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARMG
MSOO vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOO vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.17% | -80.28% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.52% | -73.55% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.86% | -52.13% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.08% | — |
Volatility
MSOO vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 50.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 128.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.18% | 149.49% | -84.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.18% | 145.42% | -80.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.18% | 145.42% | -80.24% |
MSOO vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOO vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than ARMG's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 1.68% | 4.86% |
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | 2.20% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOO and ARMG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.
MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.68% for ARMG.
MSOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ARMG is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for MSOO and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer