TEN vs. FTI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI).

Performance

TEN vs. FTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TEN vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd	79.26%	36.04%	-16.03%	40.05%	138.54%	-8.72%	-61.54%	68.70%	-28.96%	-12.82%
FTI TechnipFMC plc	55.26%	54.90%	44.78%	66.07%	105.91%	-15.36%	-55.23%	12.09%	-36.32%	-11.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TEN : $1.17B FTI : $28.97B
EPS TEN : $3.71 FTI : $2.29
PE Ratio TEN : 10.64 FTI : 30.18
PEG Ratio TEN : 0.01 FTI : 0.03
PS Ratio TEN : 1.50 FTI : 2.93
PB Ratio TEN : 0.67 FTI : 8.61
Total Revenue (TTM) TEN : $778.78M FTI : $9.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) TEN : $260.15M FTI : $1.72B
EBITDA (TTM) TEN : $332.66M FTI : $1.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEN achieves a 79.26% return, which is significantly higher than FTI's 55.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TEN has underperformed FTI with an annualized return of 7.37%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.

TEN

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 11.78%
• YTD: 79.26%
• 6M: 84.81%
• 1Y: 147.87%
• 3Y*: 35.70%
• 5Y*: 38.61%
• 10Y*: 7.37%

FTI

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 55.26%
• 6M: 75.58%
• 1Y: 119.24%
• 3Y*: 72.85%
• 5Y*: 54.61%
• 10Y*: 14.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TEN vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEN

TEN Risk / Return Rank: 97
TEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
TEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
TEN Omega Ratio Rank: 94
TEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TEN Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FTI

FTI Risk / Return Rank: 95
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEN vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEN	FTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.47	3.00	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.36	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.53	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.51	4.24	+3.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.75	17.06	+10.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEN vs. FTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEN Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the FTI Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEN and FTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEN	FTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47	3.00	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	1.27	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.29	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.29	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between TEN and FTI is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TEN vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison

TEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than FTI's 0.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd	4.05%	4.91%	8.65%	5.85%	1.48%	1.38%	6.23%	2.29%	5.64%	5.12%	6.18%	3.03%
FTI TechnipFMC plc	0.29%	0.45%	0.69%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	1.38%	2.43%	2.66%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TEN vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEN drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FTI drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEN and FTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEN	FTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.52%	-91.74%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.48%	-28.94%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.64%	-47.36%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.25%	-85.71%	+12.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.15%	-2.89%	-44.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.29%	-34.15%	-23.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	7.20%	-1.93%

Volatility

TEN vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison

Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to TechnipFMC plc (FTI) at 10.34%. This indicates that TEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEN	FTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.07%	10.34%	+4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.00%	21.64%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.85%	40.00%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.06%	43.33%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.58%	47.80%	+1.78%

Financials

TEN vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd and TechnipFMC plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported a gross profit of 63.68M and revenue of 193.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of -723.60M and revenue of 2.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -28.8%.

TEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported an operating income of 50.44M and revenue of 193.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of -109.50M and revenue of 2.52B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.4%.

TEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported a net income of 26.52M and revenue of 193.31M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 242.70M and revenue of 2.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.