TEN vs. FTI
TEN (Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd) and FTI (TechnipFMC plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — TEN in Oil & Gas Midstream, FTI in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services. Over the past 10 years, TEN returned 6.73%/yr vs 14.13%/yr for FTI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEN vs. FTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEN achieves a 67.72% return, which is significantly higher than FTI's 52.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TEN has underperformed FTI with an annualized return of 6.73%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.
TEN
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -13.72%
- YTD
- 67.72%
- 6M
- 55.55%
- 1Y
- 121.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.90%
- 5Y*
- 39.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
FTI
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- 52.69%
- 6M
- 45.79%
- 1Y
- 114.38%
- 3Y*
- 67.09%
- 5Y*
- 46.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
TEN vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd | 67.72% | 36.04% | -16.03% | 40.05% | 138.54% | -8.72% | -61.54% | 68.70% | -28.96% | -12.82% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 52.69% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -36.32% | -11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEN and FTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2002 | 0.35 |
The correlation between TEN and FTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TEN:
$1.11B
FTI:
$27.85B
TEN:
$7.10
FTI:
$2.59
TEN:
5.20
FTI:
26.24
TEN:
0.01
FTI:
0.03
TEN:
1.29
FTI:
2.79
TEN:
0.57
FTI:
8.28
TEN:
$854.60M
FTI:
$10.19B
TEN:
$337.69M
FTI:
$2.75B
TEN:
$410.58M
FTI:
$1.13B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEN vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank
TEN
FTI
TEN vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEN | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.57 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.20 | 8.84 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.81 | 25.58 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEN | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31 | 3.65 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.09 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.30 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.29 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
TEN vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEN drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FTI drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEN and FTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEN | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.52% | -91.74% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -13.01% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.64% | -28.94% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.64% | -47.36% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.36% | -85.71% | +13.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.55% | -11.69% | -38.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.21% | -33.95% | -23.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 4.49% | +0.63% |
Volatility
TEN vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI) have volatilities of 9.83% and 9.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEN | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 9.75% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.99% | 21.81% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.94% | 31.56% | +5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.99% | 42.53% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.50% | 47.75% | +1.75% |
Dividends
TEN vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison
TEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than FTI's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.29% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd | 4.33% | 4.91% | 8.65% | 5.85% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 6.23% | 2.29% | 5.64% | 5.12% | 6.18% | 3.03% |
Financials
TEN vs. FTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEN vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison
TEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported a gross profit of 122.32M and revenue of 252.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.
TEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported an operating income of 109.88M and revenue of 252.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.4%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
TEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported a net income of 88.84M and revenue of 252.96M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEN and FTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEN has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to FTI (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEN dropped -92.52% vs FTI's -91.74%.
FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 3.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEN and FTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer