TEN vs. UGP
TEN (Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd) and UGP (Ultrapar Participações S.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — TEN in Oil & Gas Midstream, UGP in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing. Over the past 10 years, TEN returned 10.54%/yr vs -2.08%/yr for UGP. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TEN vs. UGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEN achieves a 87.00% return, which is significantly higher than UGP's 72.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TEN has outperformed UGP with an annualized return of 10.54%, while UGP has yielded a comparatively lower -2.08% annualized return.
TEN
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 54.31%
- YTD
- 87.00%
- 1Y
- 120.24%
- 3Y*
- 34.03%
- 5Y*
- 45.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.47%
UGP
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 35.98%
- YTD
- 72.41%
- 1Y
- 126.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- -2.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.70M | $8.38M | $11.43M | |
| $21.03M | $27.86M | $20.99M |
TEN vs. UGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd | 87.00% | 36.04% | -16.03% | 40.05% | 138.54% | -8.72% | -61.54% | 68.70% | -28.96% | -12.82% |
UGP Ultrapar Participações S.A. | 72.41% | 57.18% | -50.30% | 128.76% | -4.60% | -39.49% | -26.69% | -5.15% | -38.91% | 12.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEN and UGP is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
TEN:
$1.21B
UGP:
$6.95B
TEN:
$7.08
UGP:
R$2.71
TEN:
5.66
UGP:
12.16
TEN:
0.01
UGP:
0.33
TEN:
1.40
UGP:
0.25
TEN:
0.62
UGP:
10.88
TEN:
$854.60M
UGP:
R$144.45B
TEN:
$337.69M
UGP:
R$10.28B
TEN:
$410.58M
UGP:
R$8.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEN vs. UGP — Risk / Return Rank
TEN
UGP
TEN vs. UGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) and Ultrapar Participações S.A. (UGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEN | UGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.50 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.99 | 5.48 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.97 | 16.57 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEN vs. UGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEN drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, which is greater than UGP's maximum drawdown of -83.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEN and UGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEN | UGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.52% | -83.31% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.46% | -23.24% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.64% | -58.58% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.64% | -58.58% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.69% | -83.31% | +14.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.87% | -33.75% | -11.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.17% | -30.06% | -27.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 7.67% | -0.46% |
Volatility
TEN vs. UGP - Volatility Comparison
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd (TEN) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Ultrapar Participações S.A. (UGP) at 10.04%. This indicates that TEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEN | UGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.89% | 10.04% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.29% | 23.73% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.16% | 36.31% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.92% | 42.36% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.21% | 48.02% | +1.19% |
Dividends
TEN vs. UGP - Dividend Comparison
TEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than UGP's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd | 4.99% | 4.91% | 8.65% | 5.85% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 6.23% | 2.29% | 5.64% | 5.12% | 6.18% | 3.03% |
UGP Ultrapar Participações S.A. | 3.74% | 8.50% | 4.76% | 1.30% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.20% | 2.28% | 3.15% | 2.39% | 2.23% | 2.93% |
Financials
TEN vs. UGP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd and Ultrapar Participações S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEN vs. UGP - Profitability Comparison
TEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported a gross profit of 122.32M and revenue of 252.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
UGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ultrapar Participações S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.06B and revenue of 35.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.
TEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported an operating income of 109.88M and revenue of 252.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.4%.
UGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ultrapar Participações S.A. reported an operating income of 1.79B and revenue of 35.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
TEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd reported a net income of 88.84M and revenue of 252.96M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.
UGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ultrapar Participações S.A. reported a net income of 843.54M and revenue of 35.41B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEN and UGP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEN has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to UGP (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEN dropped -92.52% vs UGP's -83.31%.
UGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 3.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEN and UGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer