TEMWX vs. GIDGX
TEMWX (Templeton World Fund) and GIDGX (Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TEMWX returned 8.31%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for GIDGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEMWX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for GIDGX.
Performance
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMWX achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than GIDGX's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMWX has underperformed GIDGX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while GIDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
TEMWX
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 16.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
GIDGX
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMWX Templeton World Fund | 3.88% | 21.42% | 20.34% | 32.29% | -22.91% | 8.04% | 3.59% | 12.03% | -12.02% | 12.74% |
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 10.38% | 15.74% | 20.59% | 17.92% | -12.75% | 18.46% | 8.41% | 19.97% | -8.26% | 15.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMWX and GIDGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TEMWX and GIDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMWX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMWX
GIDGX
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMWX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 3.26 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 15.32 | -9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMWX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMWX and GIDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMWX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -31.63% | -23.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -7.14% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | -14.69% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -20.39% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | -31.63% | -0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -1.33% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -3.86% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 1.51% | +2.00% |
Volatility
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 3.98%. This indicates that TEMWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMWX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 3.98% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 8.43% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 10.23% | +6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 13.07% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 14.13% | +2.67% |
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMWX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMWX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison
TEMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.84%, more than GIDGX's 5.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 5.59% | 5.92% | 12.06% | 4.32% | 8.89% | 8.41% | 1.99% | 4.85% | 5.67% | 3.35% | 2.97% | 3.21% |
TEMWX Templeton World Fund | 12.84% | 13.34% | 8.52% | 0.63% | 1.60% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 21.11% | 5.83% | 2.77% | 5.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMWX and GIDGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEMWX has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to GIDGX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMWX dropped -55.26% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.
GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEMWX and GIDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer