TEMR vs. BLUC

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while BLUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLUC.

Performance

TEMR vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMR

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -8.10%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUC

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 1Y: 17.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMR vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	8.70%
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMR and BLUC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

TEMR vs. BLUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC

BLUC Risk / Return Rank: 47
BLUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BLUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BLUC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BLUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BLUC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMR vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMR	BLUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.54	—

Drawdowns

TEMR vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -11.29%, which is greater than BLUC's maximum drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and BLUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMR	BLUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.29%	-10.69%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.29%	-3.41%	-7.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-1.70%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMR	BLUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.45%	13.75%	+19.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.45%	13.46%	+19.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.45%	13.46%	+19.99%

TEMR vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUC's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMR vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

TEMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	0.63%	0.46%
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMR and BLUC in my portfolio?

TEMR and BLUC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMR or BLUC?

On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMR or BLUC?

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMR or BLUC?

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for TEMR.

What is the main difference between TEMR and BLUC?

TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLUC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.23% for BLUC.