TEM vs. NBIS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TEM (Tempus AI, Inc) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. TEM operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, TEM returned -21.82% vs 623.43% for NBIS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TEM vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tempus AI, Inc (TEM) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEM achieves a -15.97% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 211.31% return.

TEM

• 1D: -6.02%
• 1M: -9.78%
• YTD: -15.97%
• 6M: -32.92%
• 1Y: -21.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIS

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 68.67%
• YTD: 211.31%
• 6M: 170.17%
• 1Y: 623.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEM vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TEM Tempus AI, Inc	-15.97%	74.91%	-31.58%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	211.31%	202.18%	46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TEM and NBIS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024	0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap TEM : $8.88B NBIS : $80.51B
EPS TEM : -$1.73 NBIS : $3.17
PS Ratio TEM : 6.38 NBIS : 78.20
PB Ratio TEM : 21.33 NBIS : 11.12
Total Revenue (TTM) TEM : $1.36B NBIS : $877.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) TEM : $977.64M NBIS : $420.60M
EBITDA (TTM) TEM : -$233.09M NBIS : -$52.78M

Return for Risk

TEM vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEM

TEM Risk / Return Rank: 30
TEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
TEM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
TEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
TEM Martin Ratio Rank: 35

NBIS

NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEM vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tempus AI, Inc (TEM) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEM	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	5.99	-6.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	4.73	-4.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.53	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	13.40	-13.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	30.86	-31.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEM vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 5.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEM and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEM	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	5.99	-6.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	3.74	-3.62

Drawdowns

TEM vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEM drawdown since its inception was -58.99%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIS drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEM and NBIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEM	NBIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.99%	-58.27%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.96%	-45.47%	-13.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.94%	-1.49%	-50.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.72%	-19.11%	-12.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.41%	19.74%	+14.67%

Volatility

TEM vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tempus AI, Inc (TEM) is 16.58%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 33.33%. This indicates that TEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEM	NBIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.58%	33.33%	-16.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.99%	70.22%	-27.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.96%	105.07%	-40.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	98.47%	110.65%	-12.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	98.47%	110.65%	-12.18%

Dividends

TEM vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEM nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEM and NBIS in my portfolio?

TEM and NBIS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEM or NBIS?

NBIS has higher volatility (33.33%) compared to TEM (16.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEM dropped -58.99% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.