TEK vs. GQGU
TEK (iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while GQGU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by GQG Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TEK returned 39.18% vs 4.92% for GQGU. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. TEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
TEK vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 27.66% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.11% return.
TEK
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- 6M
- 23.88%
- YTD
- 27.66%
- 1Y
- 39.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEK vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | 27.66% | 9.02% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.11% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEK and GQGU is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEK vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
TEK
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TEK vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEK | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEK vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEK | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.24% | -8.41% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.29% | -8.41% | -10.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -5.09% | -6.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -2.88% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.99% | — | — |
Volatility
TEK vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEK | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.05% | 10.74% | +20.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 10.74% | +20.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 10.74% | +20.70% |
TEK vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEK vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% |
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | 1.24% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEK and GQGU have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, TEK leads with 39.18% vs 4.92% for GQGU. On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEK has performed better with a 39.18% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.
TEK has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.96% for GQGU.
TEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GQGU is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for TEK and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer