PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEK vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEK vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 21.44% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 18.16% return.


TEK

1D
1.29%
1M
-7.12%
6M
19.04%
YTD
21.44%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.70%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M
$171.97K$226.82K$208.52K

TEK vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEK and FDL is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

-0.11

The correlation between TEK and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEK vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEK
FDL

Technology

85.8%
4.3%

Industrials

5.3%
3.6%

Communication Services

5.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
0.4%

Financial Services

0.3%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Energy

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

11.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

15.4%

Technology

TEK
85.8%
FDL
4.3%

Industrials

TEK
5.3%
FDL
3.6%

Communication Services

TEK
5.2%
FDL
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TEK
2.9%
FDL
4.4%

Basic Materials

TEK
0.8%
FDL
0.4%

Financial Services

TEK
0.3%
FDL
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

TEK

-

FDL
24.3%

Energy

TEK

-

FDL
11.1%

Healthcare

TEK

-

FDL
11.7%

Real Estate

TEK

-

FDL

-

Utilities

TEK

-

FDL
15.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEK vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEK
TEK Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEK Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEK vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEKFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.39

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

6.29

-5.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

14.86

-11.33

TEK vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEK Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEK and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEK vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEKFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-65.93%

+37.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.55%

-4.27%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.72%

-1.96%

-13.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-9.59%

+3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

1.81%

+6.01%

Volatility

TEK vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.96%. This indicates that TEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEKFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

4.96%

+9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.28%

8.97%

+20.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.18%

11.95%

+21.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.24%

14.44%

+17.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.24%

17.16%

+15.08%

TEK vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEK vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
TEK
iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF
1.31%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEK and FDL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEK has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to FDL (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEK dropped -28.24% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 1-year performance, TEK leads with 30.40% vs 27.65% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEK has performed better with a 30.40% return vs 27.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.31% for TEK.

TEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEK and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer