PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEDMX vs. FKDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDMX achieves a 44.70% return, which is significantly higher than FKDNX's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 13.61%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.


TEDMX

1D
0.90%
1M
17.40%
YTD
44.70%
6M
48.60%
1Y
85.58%
3Y*
33.21%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.61%

FKDNX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.25%
YTD
13.49%
6M
12.49%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
44.70%44.71%8.14%12.28%-22.17%-5.82%18.65%26.39%-16.21%40.21%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
13.49%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDMX and FKDNX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1992

0.48

The correlation between TEDMX and FKDNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEDMX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEDMXFKDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.27

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

1.54

+4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.57

4.79

+18.79

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is higher than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDMX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEDMXFKDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22

1.55

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.67

-0.24

Drawdowns

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDMX drawdown since its inception was -64.97%, which is greater than FKDNX's maximum drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDMX and FKDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEDMXFKDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.97%

-51.63%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-20.49%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-26.23%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.15%

-48.28%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-48.28%

+3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-11.25%

-8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

6.57%

-2.95%

Volatility

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) at 4.76%. This indicates that TEDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEDMXFKDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

4.76%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

15.85%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.29%

20.38%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

26.21%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

24.61%

-5.49%

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDMX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEDMX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

TEDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than FKDNX's 9.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.84%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
1.83%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEDMX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEDMX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to FKDNX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDMX dropped -64.97% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

TEDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEDMX and FKDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer