PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECL vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECL vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECL achieves a 83.49% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 31.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TECL has outperformed QLD with an annualized return of 51.28%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively lower 35.29% annualized return.


TECL

1D
6.30%
1M
11.53%
YTD
83.49%
6M
68.65%
1Y
192.14%
3Y*
69.70%
5Y*
37.52%
10Y*
51.28%

QLD

1D
3.03%
1M
0.58%
YTD
31.05%
6M
26.63%
1Y
69.67%
3Y*
46.32%
5Y*
23.57%
10Y*
35.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECL vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
83.49%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
31.05%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TECL and QLD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008

0.96

The correlation between TECL and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TECL vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TECL
QLD

Technology

20.6%
53.8%

Energy

0.0%
0.6%

Industrials

0.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

TECL
20.6%
QLD
53.8%

Energy

TECL
0.0%
QLD
0.6%

Industrials

TECL
0.0%
QLD
2.8%

Basic Materials

TECL

-

QLD
1.1%

Communication Services

TECL

-

QLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TECL

-

QLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

TECL

-

QLD
7.7%

Financial Services

TECL

-

QLD
0.2%

Healthcare

TECL

-

QLD
4.2%

Real Estate

TECL

-

QLD
0.1%

Utilities

TECL

-

QLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECL vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECL vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECLQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.79

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.82

9.64

+2.18

TECL vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECL Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECL and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECLQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.10

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.79

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.58

+0.15

Drawdowns

TECL vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECL drawdown since its inception was -77.96%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECL and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECLQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.96%

-83.13%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.58%

-25.13%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.58%

-42.29%

-24.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.96%

-63.68%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.96%

-63.68%

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.19%

-8.24%

-12.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-18.16%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.33%

7.25%

+9.08%

Volatility

TECL vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a higher volatility of 32.17% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 13.78%. This indicates that TECL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECLQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.17%

13.78%

+18.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.30%

26.34%

+28.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.89%

33.42%

+32.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.68%

44.95%

+29.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.68%

44.68%

+28.00%

TECL vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECL has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECL vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.87%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TECL and QLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TECL has higher volatility (32.17%) compared to QLD (13.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECL dropped -77.96% vs QLD's -83.13%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 51.28% vs 35.29% for QLD. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 13.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 51.28% return vs 35.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for TECL and 0.95% for QLD.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECL and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer