TEA.AX vs. SCHG
TEA.AX (Tasmea Limited) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past year, TEA.AX returned 184.56% vs 12.47% for SCHG. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEA.AX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TEA.AX is traded in AUD, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEA.AX achieves a 96.17% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -1.91% return.
TEA.AX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 42.06%
- YTD
- 96.17%
- 6M
- 83.94%
- 1Y
- 184.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 19.04%
TEA.AX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TEA.AX Tasmea Limited | 96.17% | 46.00% | 88.65% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -1.91% | 8.97% | 30.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEA.AX and SCHG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEA.AX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
TEA.AX
SCHG
TEA.AX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tasmea Limited (TEA.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEA.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.17 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.30 | 0.63 | +4.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 1.54 | +12.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEA.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 0.93 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.49 | 1.04 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
TEA.AX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEA.AX drawdown since its inception was -33.21%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEA.AX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEA.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.21% | -31.20% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.21% | -19.81% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -6.39% | +5.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -5.15% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.67% | 8.13% | +4.54% |
Volatility
TEA.AX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Tasmea Limited (TEA.AX) has a higher volatility of 17.65% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.19%. This indicates that TEA.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEA.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.65% | 3.19% | +14.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.65% | 10.07% | +26.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.57% | 13.57% | +34.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 19.74% | +29.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 19.67% | +29.31% |
Dividends
TEA.AX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
TEA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
TEA.AX Tasmea Limited | 2.95% | 5.46% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEA.AX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TEA.AX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer