TDW vs. FLKR
TDW (Tidewater Inc.) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, TDW returned 38.25%/yr vs 18.41%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TDW vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDW achieves a 47.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 104.96% return.
TDW
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -12.62%
- YTD
- 47.06%
- 6M
- 24.84%
- 1Y
- 76.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 38.25%
- 10Y*
- -8.39%
FLKR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 104.96%
- 6M
- 121.64%
- 1Y
- 213.10%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
TDW vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDW Tidewater Inc. | 47.06% | -7.68% | -24.13% | 95.69% | 244.07% | 23.96% | -55.14% | 0.78% | -21.60% | -10.95% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 104.96% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDW and FLKR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.24 |
The correlation between TDW and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDW vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
TDW
FLKR
TDW vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidewater Inc. (TDW) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDW | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.67 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 9.32 | -6.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 34.49 | -27.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDW | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 5.18 | -3.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.53 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
TDW vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDW drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDW and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDW | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -50.06% | -49.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.16% | -23.03% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.35% | -26.39% | -43.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.35% | -49.51% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.40% | -6.10% | -90.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.97% | -22.06% | -26.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | 6.21% | +5.12% |
Volatility
TDW vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tidewater Inc. (TDW) is 11.08%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.38%. This indicates that TDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDW | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 20.38% | -9.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.14% | 36.87% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.39% | 41.48% | +12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.44% | 28.25% | +25.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.76% | 27.60% | +39.16% |
Dividends
TDW vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
TDW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.89% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDW Tidewater Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 14.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDW and FLKR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to TDW (11.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDW dropped -99.80% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDW and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer