PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVG vs. TCAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDVG vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than TCAF's 7.01% return.


TDVG

1D
0.86%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.68%
6M
8.35%
1Y
17.75%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*

TCAF

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.99%
YTD
7.01%
6M
7.07%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVG vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
7.68%14.80%13.45%7.98%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
7.01%15.45%20.93%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and TCAF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.83

The correlation between TDVG and TCAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDVG vs. TCAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDVG
TCAF

Technology

24.1%
33.7%

Financial Services

19.5%
6.0%

Industrials

13.6%
4.6%

Healthcare

12.9%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
3.3%

Energy

5.8%
2.6%

Utilities

3.9%
8.6%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.2%
11.4%

Technology

TDVG
24.1%
TCAF
33.7%

Financial Services

TDVG
19.5%
TCAF
6.0%

Industrials

TDVG
13.6%
TCAF
4.6%

Healthcare

TDVG
12.9%
TCAF
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TDVG
7.7%
TCAF
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

TDVG
7.1%
TCAF
3.3%

Energy

TDVG
5.8%
TCAF
2.6%

Utilities

TDVG
3.9%
TCAF
8.6%

Basic Materials

TDVG
2.9%
TCAF
0.1%

Real Estate

TDVG
1.6%
TCAF
0.1%

Communication Services

TDVG
1.2%
TCAF
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDVG vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVGTCAFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.92

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

2.63

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.01

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.27

8.07

+2.20

TDVG vs. TCAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the TCAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and TCAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVGTCAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.92

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.28

-0.33

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, which is greater than TCAF's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and TCAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVGTCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-16.37%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-11.33%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-2.06%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.82%

-1.06%

Volatility

TDVG vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVGTCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

2.35%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

8.78%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

11.47%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.95%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

13.95%

-0.02%

TDVG vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDVG vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than TCAF's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.98%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDVG and TCAF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCAF has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to TDVG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs TCAF's -16.37%.

On 1-year performance, TCAF leads with 21.86% vs 17.75% for TDVG. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TCAF has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 17.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.31% for TCAF.

TCAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDVG and TCAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer