TCAF vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCAF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TCAF returned 17.42%/yr vs 24.17%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCAF charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

TCAF vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.07% return.

TCAF

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 4.09%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 11.07%
• 6M: 10.39%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF	4.55%	15.45%	20.93%	9.71%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.07%	25.50%	20.10%	13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and CGDV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023	0.86

The correlation between TCAF and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCAF vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCAF	CGDV
Technology	34.0%	33.1%
Healthcare	17.6%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	11.3%
Communication Services	10.5%	8.3%
Utilities	8.7%	1.0%
Financial Services	6.1%	6.6%
Industrials	4.7%	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	6.0%
Energy	2.6%	4.4%
Basic Materials	0.1%	2.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

TCAF vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF

TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 39
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 69
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCAF	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.23	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.06	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.41	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.81	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.00	13.07	-7.07

TCAF vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAF	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-21.82%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-9.75%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	-14.28%	-2.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-1.79%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-3.59%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.09%	+0.79%

Volatility

TCAF vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is 4.21%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that TCAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCAF	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	4.64%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	9.92%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.00%	12.28%	-0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	15.57%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	15.57%	-1.55%

TCAF vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAF vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than CGDV's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.18%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.43%	0.26%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAF and CGDV in my portfolio?

TCAF and CGDV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCAF or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to TCAF (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, TCAF or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.17% vs 17.42% for TCAF. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCAF or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.17% return vs 17.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAF or CGDV?

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAF or CGDV?

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.48% for TCAF.

What is the main difference between TCAF and CGDV?

TCAF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.