PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVG vs. TBUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TDVG vs. TBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TDVG vs. TBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
-0.44%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%9.91%
TBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
0.83%5.37%6.38%6.39%-0.13%-0.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than TBUX's 0.83% return.


TDVG

1D
2.08%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
2.12%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*

TBUX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.83%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TDVG vs. TBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TBUX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TDVG vs. TBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TBUX
TBUX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. TBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVGTBUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

5.83

-5.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

10.05

-8.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

2.64

-1.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

14.68

-13.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.46

99.53

-94.07

TDVG vs. TBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the TBUX Sharpe Ratio of 5.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and TBUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVGTBUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

5.83

-5.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

3.82

-2.96

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and TBUX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TDVG vs. TBUX - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than TBUX's 4.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
1.06%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%
TBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
4.55%4.67%5.39%4.66%2.58%0.27%0.00%

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. TBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, which is greater than TBUX's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and TBUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVGTBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-1.79%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-0.33%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

0.00%

-5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-0.29%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

0.05%

+2.31%

Volatility

TDVG vs. TBUX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) at 0.25%. This indicates that TDVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDVGTBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

0.25%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

0.44%

+7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

0.84%

+14.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

1.08%

+12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

1.08%

+12.96%