PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVG vs. QGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TDVG vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TDVG vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
-0.22%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%26.20%12.98%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
-7.37%15.18%31.42%32.42%-24.54%24.57%14.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's -7.37% return.


TDVG

1D
0.22%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
2.16%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*

QGRO

1D
0.97%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-7.37%
6M
-7.31%
1Y
12.69%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TDVG vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TDVG vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVGQGRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.59

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

0.99

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.99

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.01

3.37

+1.64

TDVG vs. QGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the QGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and QGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVGQGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.59

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.50

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.61

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and QGRO is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TDVG vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than QGRO's 0.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
1.06%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%0.00%0.00%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.21%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and QGRO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVGQGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-32.56%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-13.54%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-31.86%

+12.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-9.65%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-7.76%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.99%

-1.61%

Volatility

TDVG vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 4.06%, while American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDVGQGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

6.61%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

12.39%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.99%

21.68%

-6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

21.12%

-7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

23.09%

-9.06%