TDVG vs. PRDGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and PRDGX (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.) are both funds - TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRDGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, TDVG returned 10.03%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for PRDGX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PRDGX.

Performance

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TDVG having a 7.48% return and PRDGX slightly higher at 7.60%.

TDVG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: —

PRDGX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 17.14%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 12.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	7.48%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	26.20%	12.98%
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	7.60%	14.74%	13.48%	13.68%	-10.22%	26.03%	13.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and PRDGX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020	0.99

The correlation between TDVG and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TDVG vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 51
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PRDGX

PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDVG	PRDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.82	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.60	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.41	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	9.85	-0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDVG	PRDGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	1.82	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.72	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.66	+0.28

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and PRDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDVG	PRDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.20%	-49.79%	+30.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-7.34%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.02%	-14.15%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.20%	-19.31%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-5.42%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	1.79%	-0.03%

Volatility

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 2.11%, while T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDVG	PRDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	2.33%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.45%	7.56%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.67%	9.72%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	14.06%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.93%	15.88%	-1.95%

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDVG vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than PRDGX's 7.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	7.52%	8.02%	4.66%	2.78%	3.81%	2.00%	1.03%	2.33%	3.67%	1.82%	3.07%	7.57%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDVG and PRDGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, TDVG and PRDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TDVG or PRDGX?

PRDGX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to TDVG (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.