TDVG vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

TDVG vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TDVG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 17.75%
• 3Y*: 15.70%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVG vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.63%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and GRW is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.50

TDVG vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDVG	GRW
Technology	24.1%	26.6%
Financial Services	19.5%	9.8%
Industrials	13.6%	38.1%
Healthcare	12.9%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	-
Energy	5.8%	-
Utilities	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.0%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Communication Services	1.2%	9.1%

Return for Risk

TDVG vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 53
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDVG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDVG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	37.56	-36.62

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDVG	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.20%	-0.13%	-19.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-0.04%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TDVG	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.67%	9.26%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	9.26%	+4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.93%	9.26%	+4.67%

TDVG vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDVG vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDVG and GRW in my portfolio?

TDVG and GRW have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TDVG or GRW?

On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDVG or GRW?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDVG or GRW?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between TDVG and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.75% for GRW.