TDV vs. CLML.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO).
TDV and CLML.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019.
Performance
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | -1.87% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 13.22% |
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 10.77% | 31.21% | 50.30% | 15.40% | -24.13% | 8.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
TDV is traded in USD, while CLML.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLML.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than CLML.TO's 10.77% return.
TDV
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CLML.TO
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 55.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
TDV vs. CLML.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
CLML.TO
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDV | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 2.20 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 3.33 | -2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 4.60 | -3.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 19.59 | -14.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDV | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.20 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.77 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and CLML.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.17% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% |
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than CLML.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and CLML.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -28.17% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -11.79% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -4.51% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -9.24% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.79% | +0.73% |
Volatility
TDV vs. CLML.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 6.19%, while CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLML.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 7.42% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 15.51% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.83% | 25.27% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 21.78% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 21.78% | +1.54% |