PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. STPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TDTT having a 1.81% return and STPZ slightly lower at 1.79%. Over the past 10 years, TDTT has outperformed STPZ with an annualized return of 3.11%, while STPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.89% annualized return.


TDTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
3.11%

STPZ

1D
-0.00%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTT vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.81%6.67%3.96%4.40%-4.58%5.49%6.84%5.74%0.25%0.43%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
1.79%6.40%4.30%4.28%-4.49%5.64%5.44%4.83%0.04%0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and STPZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2011

0.82

The correlation between TDTT and STPZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

STPZ
STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTT vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDTTSTPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.49

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

4.87

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.59

16.28

+0.31

TDTT vs. STPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the STPZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and STPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDTTSTPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.49

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.89

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.97

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.90

-0.21

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, roughly equal to the maximum STPZ drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and STPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTSTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-6.77%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-0.93%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

-1.35%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

-6.70%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

-6.77%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.11%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-1.31%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.28%

0.00%

Volatility

TDTT vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) have volatilities of 0.46% and 0.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTSTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.46%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

1.20%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.83%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

3.29%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

2.98%

+0.40%

TDTT vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTT vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than STPZ's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
4.10%3.65%1.97%1.63%5.88%3.65%1.86%1.76%2.23%1.51%0.65%0.49%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.54%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTT and STPZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STPZ has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to TDTT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs STPZ's -6.77%.

On 10-year performance, TDTT leads with 3.11% vs 2.89% for STPZ. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDTT has performed better with a 3.11% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for STPZ.

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.10% for STPZ.

TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS, while STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.20% for STPZ.

TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and STPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer