TDTT vs. MINT
TDTT (FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDTT is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. TDTT is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDTT returned 3.11%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for MINT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDTT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
TDTT vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with TDTT at 1.81% and MINT at 1.81%. Over the past 10 years, TDTT has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 3.11%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.
TDTT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
TDTT vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.81% | 6.67% | 3.96% | 4.40% | -4.58% | 5.49% | 6.84% | 5.74% | 0.25% | 0.43% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.81% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDTT and MINT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2011 | 0.18 |
The correlation between TDTT and MINT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDTT vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
TDTT
MINT
TDTT vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDTT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -61.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 20.53 | -19.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 94.30 | -89.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 939.26 | -922.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDTT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 17.09 | -14.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 5.99 | -5.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 2.87 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 2.47 | -1.77 |
Drawdowns
TDTT vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDTT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -4.62% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -0.05% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.53% | -0.16% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.97% | -2.42% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.97% | -4.62% | -2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -0.17% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.00% | +0.28% |
Volatility
TDTT vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that TDTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDTT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.09% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.21% | 0.20% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85% | 0.27% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 0.58% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 0.95% | +2.43% |
TDTT vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDTT vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.54% | 4.52% | 4.01% | 3.88% | 6.97% | 4.53% | 1.15% | 1.91% | 2.48% | 1.88% | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDTT and MINT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDTT has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 10-year performance, TDTT leads with 3.11% vs 2.70% for MINT. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TDTT has performed better with a 3.11% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.
TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.
TDTT is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDTT and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer