TDTF vs. TDTT

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT).

TDTF and TDTT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDTF is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. TDTT is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. Both TDTF and TDTT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

TDTF vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TDTF vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund	0.88%	7.83%	2.40%	4.10%	-9.73%	5.54%	9.98%	7.99%	-0.82%	1.93%
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund	0.94%	6.67%	3.96%	4.40%	-4.58%	5.49%	6.84%	5.74%	0.25%	0.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTF achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than TDTT's 0.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TDTF having a 2.91% annualized return and TDTT not far ahead at 3.05%.

TDTF

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: 2.91%

TDTT

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: 3.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTF vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TDTF and TDTT have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

TDTF

FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund

TDTT

FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund

Return for Risk

TDTF vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTF

TDTF Risk / Return Rank: 58
TDTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TDTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TDTF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TDTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TDTF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

TDTT

TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 83
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTF vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDTF	TDTT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.72	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.56	-0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.36	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	2.80	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	9.09	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDTF vs. TDTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the TDTT Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTF and TDTT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDTF	TDTT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.72	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.83	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.91	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.68	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between TDTF and TDTT is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TDTF vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison

TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than TDTT's 3.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund	3.81%	4.58%	3.98%	3.97%	7.60%	4.55%	1.13%	1.80%	2.60%	2.20%	1.51%	0.21%
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund	3.69%	4.52%	4.01%	3.88%	6.97%	4.53%	1.15%	1.91%	2.48%	1.88%	1.01%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TDTF vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, which is greater than TDTT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and TDTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDTF	TDTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.02%	-6.97%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.56%	-1.40%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.02%	-6.97%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.02%	-6.97%	-5.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.27%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-1.62%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	0.43%	+0.26%

Volatility

TDTF vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) at 0.70%. This indicates that TDTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDTF	TDTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	0.70%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.13%	1.21%	+0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	2.36%	+1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.70%	3.68%	+2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.08%	3.38%	+1.70%