PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTF vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTF vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTF achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TDTF has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 2.82%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.


TDTF

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.12%
6M
0.53%
YTD
1.01%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
2.82%
ALL TIME*
2.23%

TIP

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.31%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
0.28%
10Y*
2.35%
ALL TIME*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.31M$3.20M$4.11M
$236.68M$186.36M$220.38M

TDTF vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.01%7.83%2.40%4.10%-9.73%5.54%9.98%7.99%-0.82%1.93%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.73%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTF and TIP is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2011

0.89

The correlation between TDTF and TIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTF vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDTF
TDTF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TDTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDTF vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDTFTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.09

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.86

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

2.27

+0.94

TDTF vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTF and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDTF vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, smaller than the maximum TIP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTFTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-14.57%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.58%

-1.98%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-3.71%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-14.51%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

-14.51%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.12%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-3.41%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.75%

-0.12%

Volatility

TDTF vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) have volatilities of 0.71% and 0.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTFTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.72%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

2.51%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

3.32%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

6.20%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

5.72%

-0.65%

TDTF vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TDTF and TIP have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTF vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than TIP's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
5.84%4.58%3.98%3.97%7.60%4.55%1.13%1.80%2.60%2.20%1.51%0.21%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
4.97%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TDTF and TIP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIP has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to TDTF (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTF dropped -12.02% vs TIP's -14.57%.

On 10-year performance, TDTF leads with 2.82% vs 2.35% for TIP. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDTF has performed better with a 2.82% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTF and TIP have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

TDTF has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 4.97% for TIP.

TDTF tracks iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares.

TDTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTF and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer