TDSC vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. TDSC is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDSC returned 3.28%/yr vs -4.51%/yr for SENT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

TDSC vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TDSC

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.88%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSC vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	11.42%	6.56%	7.10%	7.63%	-19.67%	13.94%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSC and SENT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.39

The correlation between TDSC and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDSC vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDSC	SENT
Technology	28.5%	26.2%
Healthcare	19.9%	24.8%
Energy	17.6%	10.3%
Utilities	15.0%	-
Communication Services	4.7%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	10.1%
Financial Services	3.9%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	3.1%
Industrials	2.0%	14.6%
Basic Materials	0.7%	3.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

TDSC vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC

TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 71
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDSC	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.51	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDSC	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	-0.36	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	-0.25	+0.66

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDSC	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.51%	-30.34%	+8.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.35%	0.00%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	-15.83%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	-30.34%	+8.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-27.23%	+27.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-20.90%	+11.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	0.00%	+1.37%

Volatility

TDSC vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that TDSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDSC	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	0.00%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	0.00%	+6.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.90%	0.00%	+8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.28%	12.66%	-2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.22%	13.32%	-3.10%

TDSC vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDSC vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	2.01%	2.92%	2.06%	2.06%	1.76%	1.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDSC and SENT in my portfolio?

TDSC and SENT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDSC or SENT?

TDSC has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSC dropped -21.51% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, TDSC or SENT?

On 5-year performance, TDSC leads with 3.28% vs -4.51% for SENT. On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDSC or SENT?

Over the 5-year period, TDSC has performed better with a 3.28% return vs -4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDSC or SENT?

TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDSC or SENT?

TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between TDSC and SENT?

TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while SENT is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 1.01% for SENT.