PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSC vs. AMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TDSC vs. AMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TDSC vs. AMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
3.10%6.56%7.10%7.63%-19.67%14.81%-0.11%
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
-3.01%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%16.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSC achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than AMOM's -3.01% return.


TDSC

1D
1.72%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
3.10%
6M
3.92%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*

AMOM

1D
4.10%
1M
-7.43%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TDSC vs. AMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AMOM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TDSC vs. AMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. AMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSCAMOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

1.00

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

1.49

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

1.93

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.23

6.59

-4.36

TDSC vs. AMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the AMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSC and AMOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSCAMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.00

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.31

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.58

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between TDSC and AMOM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TDSC vs. AMOM - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than AMOM's 0.09% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.17%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%0.00%
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.09%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. AMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum AMOM drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and AMOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSCAMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

-39.68%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-13.10%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-39.68%

+18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-9.54%

+5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-11.05%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.84%

-0.45%

Volatility

TDSC vs. AMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 3.72%, while QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDSCAMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

8.79%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

17.55%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

25.18%

-12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.32%

23.51%

-13.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.29%

24.98%

-14.69%