TDSB vs. RHTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) and RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TDSB returned 8.77%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for RHTX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDSB charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RHTX.

Performance

TDSB vs. RHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than RHTX's 8.61% return.

TDSB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 8.77%
• 5Y*: 2.16%
• 10Y*: —

RHTX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 10.15%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSB vs. RHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF	4.54%	12.95%	3.56%	4.71%	-16.83%	-1.42%
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	8.61%	15.42%	18.27%	7.02%	-19.72%	-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and RHTX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021	0.58

The correlation between TDSB and RHTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDSB vs. RHTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDSB	RHTX
Utilities	33.1%	2.5%
Healthcare	32.8%	9.0%
Technology	19.6%	30.6%
Communication Services	5.6%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	4.1%
Industrials	1.0%	13.5%
Basic Materials	0.4%	2.9%
Energy	0.2%	4.2%
Financial Services	0.1%	12.6%
Real Estate	0.0%	3.9%

Return for Risk

TDSB vs. RHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSB

TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 73
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

RHTX

RHTX Risk / Return Rank: 47
RHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
RHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSB vs. RHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDSB	RHTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.73	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.24	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.32	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.04	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	7.19	+5.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDSB vs. RHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the RHTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and RHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDSB	RHTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	1.73	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.30	+0.01

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. RHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum RHTX drawdown of -24.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and RHTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDSB	RHTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-24.68%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.64%	-12.77%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.84%	-18.73%	+11.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.37%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-9.63%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	3.61%	-2.44%

Volatility

TDSB vs. RHTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 1.64%, while RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RHTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDSB	RHTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.64%	4.11%	-2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	12.49%	-7.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.98%	15.06%	-9.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.32%	18.03%	-10.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.53%	18.03%	-10.50%

TDSB vs. RHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than RHTX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDSB vs. RHTX - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while RHTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF	2.13%	1.93%	3.50%	2.77%	1.81%	1.75%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDSB and RHTX in my portfolio?

TDSB and RHTX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDSB or RHTX?

RHTX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to TDSB (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs RHTX's -24.68%.

Which ETF is better, TDSB or RHTX?

On 3-year performance, RHTX leads with 15.78% vs 8.77% for TDSB. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDSB or RHTX?

Over the 3-year period, RHTX has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDSB or RHTX?

TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDSB or RHTX?

TDSB has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for RHTX.

What is the main difference between TDSB and RHTX?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 1.38% for RHTX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.