RHTX vs. QQWZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RHTX is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Adaptive, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RHTX returned 20.43% vs 31.25% for QQWZ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHTX charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.

Performance

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHTX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than QQWZ's 14.35% return.

RHTX

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: 14.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQWZ

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 6M: 11.94%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	5.30%	20.12%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	14.35%	26.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RHTX and QQWZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	0.70

The correlation between RHTX and QQWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RHTX vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHTX

RHTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
RHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
RHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RHTX	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.01	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.65	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	4.02	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	13.81	-8.26

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the QQWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHTX and QQWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHTX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHTX and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHTX	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.68%	-7.81%	-16.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-7.81%	-4.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.38%	-4.07%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-1.44%	-8.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	2.27%	+1.42%

Volatility

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) is 5.16%, while Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that RHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHTX	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	8.52%	-3.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.29%	11.51%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	15.68%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	15.83%	+2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	15.83%	+2.23%

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHTX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

RHTX vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

RHTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

Position	TTM	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.57%	0.11%
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RHTX and QQWZ in my portfolio?

RHTX and QQWZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RHTX or QQWZ?

QQWZ has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to RHTX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHTX dropped -24.68% vs QQWZ's -7.81%.

Which ETF is better, RHTX or QQWZ?

On 1-year performance, QQWZ leads with 31.25% vs 20.43% for RHTX. On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, RHTX has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RHTX or QQWZ?

Over the 1-year period, QQWZ has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 20.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RHTX or QQWZ?

QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RHTX or QQWZ?

QQWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for RHTX.

What is the main difference between RHTX and QQWZ?

RHTX is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for RHTX and 0.49% for QQWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.