RHTX vs. GDT
RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHTX charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
RHTX vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RHTX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHTX vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | -0.66% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHTX and GDT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHTX vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
RHTX
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHTX vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RHTX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RHTX vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHTX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, roughly equal to the maximum GDT drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHTX and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHTX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.68% | -24.66% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -24.34% | +19.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -12.36% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | — | — |
Volatility
RHTX vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHTX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 31.95% | -16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 31.95% | -13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 31.95% | -13.95% |
RHTX vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RHTX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RHTX vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
RHTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.77% |
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RHTX and GDT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for RHTX.
They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for RHTX and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for RHTX and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer