RHTX vs. GDT
RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHTX charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
RHTX vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RHTX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHTX vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | -0.59% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHTX and GDT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHTX vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
RHTX
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHTX vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RHTX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RHTX vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHTX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, which is greater than GDT's maximum drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHTX and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHTX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.68% | -22.61% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -22.49% | +18.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -11.03% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | — | — |
Volatility
RHTX vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHTX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 32.99% | -17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 32.99% | -14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 32.99% | -14.93% |
RHTX vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RHTX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RHTX vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
RHTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% |
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RHTX and GDT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for RHTX.
They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for RHTX and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for RHTX and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer