TDSB vs. HTUS
TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSB is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDSB returned 2.16%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for HTUS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDSB charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
TDSB vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 11.33% return.
TDSB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
TDSB vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 4.54% | 12.95% | 3.56% | 4.71% | -16.83% | 8.44% | -1.17% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSB and HTUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between TDSB and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDSB vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDSB
HTUS
Utilities
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
TDSB
HTUS
Healthcare
TDSB
HTUS
Technology
TDSB
HTUS
Communication Services
TDSB
HTUS
Consumer Cyclical
TDSB
HTUS
Consumer Defensive
TDSB
HTUS
Industrials
TDSB
HTUS
Basic Materials
TDSB
HTUS
Energy
TDSB
HTUS
Financial Services
TDSB
HTUS
Real Estate
TDSB
HTUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSB vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
TDSB
HTUS
TDSB vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSB | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.35 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 17.27 | -4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSB | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.53 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.81 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
TDSB vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSB | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -47.50% | +27.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -8.68% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | -24.41% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.56% | -24.41% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.55% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -4.06% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.68% | -0.51% |
Volatility
TDSB vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 1.64%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSB | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | 2.47% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | 9.39% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.98% | 11.50% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 19.03% | -11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 21.45% | -13.92% |
TDSB vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSB vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than HTUS's 10.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.13% | 1.93% | 3.50% | 2.77% | 1.81% | 1.75% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSB and HTUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTUS has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to TDSB (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.35% vs 2.16% for TDSB. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.13% for TDSB.
TDSB is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDSB and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer