PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSB vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSB vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 11.33% return.


TDSB

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.64%
YTD
4.54%
6M
4.50%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*

HTUS

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.04%
YTD
11.33%
6M
12.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSB vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
4.54%12.95%3.56%4.71%-16.83%8.44%-1.17%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
11.33%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and HTUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.45

The correlation between TDSB and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDSB vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDSB
HTUS

Utilities

33.1%
2.4%

Healthcare

32.8%
8.5%

Technology

19.6%
35.6%

Communication Services

5.6%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.9%

Industrials

1.0%
8.3%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.8%

Energy

0.2%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.9%

Utilities

TDSB
33.1%
HTUS
2.4%

Healthcare

TDSB
32.8%
HTUS
8.5%

Technology

TDSB
19.6%
HTUS
35.6%

Communication Services

TDSB
5.6%
HTUS
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TDSB
4.4%
HTUS
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

TDSB
2.7%
HTUS
4.9%

Industrials

TDSB
1.0%
HTUS
8.3%

Basic Materials

TDSB
0.4%
HTUS
1.8%

Energy

TDSB
0.2%
HTUS
3.5%

Financial Services

TDSB
0.1%
HTUS
11.8%

Real Estate

TDSB
0.0%
HTUS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSB vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSB vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSBHTUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.35

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

17.27

-4.53

TDSB vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and HTUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSBHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.81

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.58

-0.26

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and HTUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSBHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-47.50%

+27.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-8.68%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-24.41%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

-24.41%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.55%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-4.06%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.68%

-0.51%

Volatility

TDSB vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 1.64%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSBHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

2.47%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

9.39%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

11.50%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.32%

19.03%

-11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

21.45%

-13.92%

TDSB vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSB vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than HTUS's 10.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.68%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.13%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDSB and HTUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTUS has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to TDSB (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs HTUS's -47.50%.

On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.35% vs 2.16% for TDSB. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.13% for TDSB.

TDSB is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSB and HTUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer