TDSB vs. EMQQ
TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) and EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSB is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. TDSB is actively managed, while EMQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDSB returned 1.78%/yr vs -12.41%/yr for EMQQ. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDSB charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMQQ.
Performance
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -24.03% return.
TDSB
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 12.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 3.08% | 12.95% | 3.56% | 4.71% | -16.83% | 8.44% | -1.46% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 21.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSB and EMQQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.33 |
The correlation between TDSB and EMQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (5 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSB vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TDSB
EMQQ
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDSB | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.84 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | -0.67 | +3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.22 | -1.31 | +11.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and EMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSB | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -73.24% | +53.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -32.55% | +27.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | -32.55% | +25.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.56% | -66.31% | +46.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -59.98% | +57.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -31.47% | +22.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 16.56% | -15.32% |
Volatility
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 2.29%, while EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSB | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 5.99% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.38% | 16.76% | -11.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.32% | 20.77% | -14.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 33.14% | -25.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 30.61% | -23.06% |
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSB vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison
TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than EMQQ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.16% | 1.93% | 3.50% | 2.77% | 1.81% | 1.75% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSB and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMQQ has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to TDSB (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.
On 5-year performance, TDSB leads with 1.78% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDSB has performed better with a 1.78% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.16% for TDSB.
TDSB is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.86% for EMQQ.
TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDSB and EMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer