TDIV vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV returned 18.79%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for QYLD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

TDIV vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 23.55% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 18.79%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.

TDIV

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 23.55%
• 6M: 23.56%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 28.46%
• 5Y*: 18.13%
• 10Y*: 18.79%

QYLD

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	23.55%	25.27%	24.43%	36.71%	-22.13%	29.49%	17.55%	33.27%	-3.18%	21.95%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.36%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and QYLD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.75

The correlation between TDIV and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDIV vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDIV	QYLD
Technology	87.1%	58.7%
Communication Services	11.6%	14.3%
Industrials	1.3%	2.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

TDIV vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV

TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 69
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TDIV	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.61	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.62	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.58	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.81	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.83	27.11	-16.28

TDIV vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDIV	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.97%	-24.75%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.35%	-4.97%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	-19.06%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	-24.61%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.97%	-24.75%	-7.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.08%	0.00%	-7.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-3.83%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	0.88%	+2.89%

Volatility

TDIV vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 3.87%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDIV	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	3.87%	+6.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.70%	7.86%	+7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	9.19%	+10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	14.77%	+6.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.98%	15.53%	+5.45%

TDIV vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDIV vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than QYLD's 11.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.41%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	1.18%	1.40%	1.59%	1.74%	2.51%	1.76%	2.07%	2.27%	2.97%	2.27%	2.45%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDIV and QYLD in my portfolio?

TDIV and QYLD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDIV or QYLD?

TDIV has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to QYLD (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, TDIV or QYLD?

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.79% vs 9.92% for QYLD. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDIV or QYLD?

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.79% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDIV or QYLD?

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDIV or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 1.18% for TDIV.

What is the main difference between TDIV and QYLD?

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.