TDIV vs. PAVE
TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDIV returned 17.37%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for PAVE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
TDIV vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TDIV having a 21.17% return and PAVE slightly lower at 20.86%.
TDIV
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.57%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 21.17% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 14.30% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV and PAVE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between TDIV and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TDIV vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDIV
PAVE
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TDIV
PAVE
Communication Services
TDIV
PAVE
-
Industrials
TDIV
PAVE
Basic Materials
TDIV
-
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
TDIV
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
TDIV
-
PAVE
Energy
TDIV
-
PAVE
Financial Services
TDIV
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
TDIV
-
PAVE
-
Real Estate
TDIV
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
TDIV
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDIV vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
TDIV
PAVE
TDIV vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDIV | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 3.11 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 11.32 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDIV vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDIV | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -44.08% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -11.91% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.00% | -26.23% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -26.23% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -1.01% | -7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -6.23% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.27% | +0.47% |
Volatility
TDIV vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 9.90% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.35%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDIV | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.90% | 7.35% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 15.87% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 19.49% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 21.70% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 24.40% | -3.44% |
TDIV vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDIV vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDIV and PAVE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDIV has higher volatility (9.90%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.84% vs 17.37% for TDIV. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 17.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDIV and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer