PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDAQ vs. MLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 25.35% return.


TDAQ

1D
-2.79%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
14.87%
6M
13.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPX

1D
1.68%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
25.35%
6M
25.51%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
29.56%
5Y*
21.27%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDAQ and MLPX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

-0.18

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDAQ
MLPX

Technology

58.7%

-

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%

-

Utilities

1.2%
0.3%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%
99.5%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDAQ
58.7%
MLPX

-

Communication Services

TDAQ
14.3%
MLPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDAQ
11.4%
MLPX

-

Consumer Defensive

TDAQ
6.4%
MLPX

-

Healthcare

TDAQ
3.7%
MLPX

-

Industrials

TDAQ
2.6%
MLPX

-

Utilities

TDAQ
1.2%
MLPX
0.3%

Basic Materials

TDAQ
1.0%
MLPX

-

Energy

TDAQ
0.5%
MLPX
99.5%

Financial Services

TDAQ
0.2%
MLPX

-

Real Estate

TDAQ
0.1%
MLPX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDAQ vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDAQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDAQMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and MLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDAQMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-70.67%

+59.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-4.34%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-16.58%

+14.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

Volatility

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDAQMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

15.43%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

19.99%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

26.47%

-7.95%

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAQ has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDAQ vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, more than MLPX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.09%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
12.14%4.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDAQ and MLPX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDAQ.

TDAQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.14%, compared with 4.09% for MLPX.

TDAQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while MLPX is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDAQ and 0.45% for MLPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDAQ and MLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer